Alas, I think we cant even completely rule out that ‘Lonely Conservative’ Raped And Murdered A Young Girl In 1990…
I think he should publish his “Innocence Certificate”, the Long Form one, of course. Just to be sure, nobody is accusing him of anything in particular, of course. http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/glenn-beck-rape-murder-hoax
(pertaining to the above) What is this, youtube now? Americans can on occasion be stupid and ignorant, but are there not idiots from every nation? I suppose we can assume every Canadian is completely backwards, or that all English are pompous assholes, or all Aussies are kangaroo ridin’ outbackers, or all Russians are communists, or-
Well, you get the point.
ahem. While usually saying such a thing would be a discredit to you, his entire article was complete bullshivik. “Anonymous Insider” almost always means “Data I pulled from my ass”.
Well, Canada is sorta completely backwards. Like giving a majority government to the conservatives. That’s pretty backwards. I guess that now with Obama in the White House we can compensate by going full-leotard.
and, since I assume you cannot see his page anymore, I wanted to say that a (possible) republican was even defending you:
Quoted from David Lassley:
Wow, way to be misinformed. I would determine Sirkowski the bigger person in this situation in the fact that s/he did not resort to blindly using a real, problematic disability as an insult. He was using such language to convey what he was trying to say. You were drawing assumptions about Obama (one whom I do not identify myself with politically at all) that were poorly done with no quotable sources. In response, s/he posed a simple philisophical question worded very crudely. the only thing that seperated his/her argument from yours (about Obama) was the lack of using “Anonymous Sources”. To further show your lack of stable argument, you simply refused him/her the right to speak, instead “banning” him/her and claiming victory.
I am not trying to defame you, Mr. Conservative, only pick apart your “troll”-dealing ‘Technique’ so that you may better it and, hopefully, better inforce your views in the future.
And then on someone who was calling you “trash”, “mentally retarded”, et cetera:
David Lassley on May 11, 2011 at 1:43 am
Good sir or madam,
If you wish to further your agenda and defame someone, such as the very controversal Sirkowski, you must provide a stable argument against them. While you certainly have attempted that, using any false/weak arguments makes the rest of it fall flat.
Calling them, I quote, “one sick person…a person with no life of their own and that no one else could ever take seriously.”, makes you appear weak enough that you must make a personal attack (with no possible philisophical content, such as Sirkowski’s) instead of either making an intellegent retort or, if insignifigant enough, waving them off.
and making a personal attack on somebody while simultaniously critisizing them for making a personal attack adds a layer of hypocracy to this mess.
Once again, I wish not to defame you, Ms. Beset, but simply help you form stronger arguments and not let people get to you as much.
(end)
And it makes me wonder if you actually had philisophical backing in your statement about… um, amourous laisions with his mother.
lol I had not checked it for a while. I didn’t know more people posted and voted. Seems Lonely Conservative thinks it’s all me using sock puppets and proxies.
TECHNICALLY we didn’t give the conservatives majority. They only got 40%. It’s because the left was split among two parties, while the right wing has only one. Seriously, it’s unfair. If we’re going to havea political system like this, there needs to be another conservative party. Even it out.
ANIME
on May 5th, 2011 at 7:14 PM
Yes he did! i have video. His sister and I made it. Mmmmm…..
on May 5th, 2011 at 8:18 PM
Alas, I think we cant even completely rule out that ‘Lonely Conservative’ Raped And Murdered A Young Girl In 1990…
I think he should publish his “Innocence Certificate”, the Long Form one, of course. Just to be sure, nobody is accusing him of anything in particular, of course.
http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/glenn-beck-rape-murder-hoax
His “…highest form of patriotism!” line reminds me of this Tom Tomorrow repost:
http://thismodernworld.com/archives/5732
on May 5th, 2011 at 8:58 PM
bushes politics fucked most of the worlds economy up imho
on May 6th, 2011 at 12:54 PM
I’m pretty sure he didn’t, Nick, because that would imply someone wanted to fuck him in the first place.
on May 6th, 2011 at 8:02 PM
“Hot debate. What do you think?”
on May 7th, 2011 at 1:32 AM
total pwnage of that lady!
I hope to never get in an argument with you
on May 7th, 2011 at 7:16 AM
Hang on… ‘your Dear Leader’? I thought you were Canadian Sirkowski? :P
on May 9th, 2011 at 2:01 PM
When dealing with someone from a nation of idiots, there is always the risk that they themself are an idiot.
on May 11th, 2011 at 1:20 AM
(pertaining to the above) What is this, youtube now? Americans can on occasion be stupid and ignorant, but are there not idiots from every nation? I suppose we can assume every Canadian is completely backwards, or that all English are pompous assholes, or all Aussies are kangaroo ridin’ outbackers, or all Russians are communists, or-
Well, you get the point.
ahem. While usually saying such a thing would be a discredit to you, his entire article was complete bullshivik. “Anonymous Insider” almost always means “Data I pulled from my ass”.
on May 11th, 2011 at 1:26 AM
Well, Canada is sorta completely backwards. Like giving a majority government to the conservatives. That’s pretty backwards. I guess that now with Obama in the White House we can compensate by going full-leotard.
on May 11th, 2011 at 1:50 AM
and, since I assume you cannot see his page anymore, I wanted to say that a (possible) republican was even defending you:
Quoted from David Lassley:
Wow, way to be misinformed. I would determine Sirkowski the bigger person in this situation in the fact that s/he did not resort to blindly using a real, problematic disability as an insult. He was using such language to convey what he was trying to say. You were drawing assumptions about Obama (one whom I do not identify myself with politically at all) that were poorly done with no quotable sources. In response, s/he posed a simple philisophical question worded very crudely. the only thing that seperated his/her argument from yours (about Obama) was the lack of using “Anonymous Sources”. To further show your lack of stable argument, you simply refused him/her the right to speak, instead “banning” him/her and claiming victory.
I am not trying to defame you, Mr. Conservative, only pick apart your “troll”-dealing ‘Technique’ so that you may better it and, hopefully, better inforce your views in the future.
And then on someone who was calling you “trash”, “mentally retarded”, et cetera:
David Lassley on May 11, 2011 at 1:43 am
Good sir or madam,
If you wish to further your agenda and defame someone, such as the very controversal Sirkowski, you must provide a stable argument against them. While you certainly have attempted that, using any false/weak arguments makes the rest of it fall flat.
Calling them, I quote, “one sick person…a person with no life of their own and that no one else could ever take seriously.”, makes you appear weak enough that you must make a personal attack (with no possible philisophical content, such as Sirkowski’s) instead of either making an intellegent retort or, if insignifigant enough, waving them off.
and making a personal attack on somebody while simultaniously critisizing them for making a personal attack adds a layer of hypocracy to this mess.
Once again, I wish not to defame you, Ms. Beset, but simply help you form stronger arguments and not let people get to you as much.
(end)
And it makes me wonder if you actually had philisophical backing in your statement about… um, amourous laisions with his mother.
on May 11th, 2011 at 11:48 AM
I reckon even if you’d used a less crude metaphor, you’d still end up banned for showing them up on their own website.
on May 11th, 2011 at 12:42 PM
lol I had not checked it for a while. I didn’t know more people posted and voted. Seems Lonely Conservative thinks it’s all me using sock puppets and proxies.
on May 13th, 2011 at 2:19 AM
TECHNICALLY we didn’t give the conservatives majority. They only got 40%. It’s because the left was split among two parties, while the right wing has only one. Seriously, it’s unfair. If we’re going to havea political system like this, there needs to be another conservative party. Even it out.
on May 23rd, 2011 at 12:56 PM
Well… That’s one way to ostracize some potential viewers.
on May 23rd, 2011 at 2:49 PM
You’re new here, are you?